It is disheartening that anyone would project their insecurities and distrust of men and use their flawed misconceptions to suggest that a so-called “real man” has some unwritten obligation to heterosexual women to protect and prohibit their ass from penetration. According to your definition, this should be an exploitative coercion for sex.

It is, however, coming from a place of a vile and malicious spirit to present that men’s role is naturally one dimensional heterosexuality or else gay by default.

If your personal experiences and the bad experiences of people that you have claimed to confide in you or that you consoled (directly or with this blog article) you have a personal bias that makes you less interested in truth and more interested in attacking people for being gay, kinky, dominant or open minded in ways different than your own.

It is further interesting that you would suggest that you or the same supporters of your ill-advised advocacy on the matter of pegging are somehow the victims of non-consensual sexual participation to keep a man. This is out right absurdity which is not grounded in logic or comprehensive to any conclusion that can be drawn in the interest of fairness and equity in a relative discussion.

I would say that I am not of the assumptions of pro advocates of pegging either in that a viable argument should be made for the viability of prostrate stimulation or defending said person on the basis that he is not gay. To the contrary, such arguments only unduly lend some validity to the absurdity suggested above.

The one thing we are certain of in the human species of this sexual/social engagement and experiment is that sex is an opportunity for which no oversimplification of the motivations, sensations and pleasures derived thereof can be reduced to gender, sexuality or mere material apparatuses.

Sex begins in the mind of the least and most imaginative persons regardless to the aforementioned. To try and relegate or regulate a persons sexual opportunities and motivations (beyond what is safe, legal and consensual) is malicious and unwarranted. To suggest pegging is a non-consensual sexual reversal for women is absurd. To pretend that penetration somehow illegitimizes manhood or heterosexuality is just sadly ignorant.