From the berzerker to Hannibal Lecter, the White devil is the man the world loves to hate. He is the rapacious, exploitive capitalist whose thirst for blood is only matched by his thirst for gold. He pursues his interests with a madness that we others would love to view as uniquely dark and especially evil even though history and current events make it clear that they are not.
Behind the Devil image is a man; a man with the same basic needs as any other, simply adapted to get those needs met in a rather unforgiving European climate.
In the past 60 years, it has become rather socially and economically inconvenient to be a White devil. The image ceased to be economically convenient because of shifts in politics, so it ceased to be socially convenient as well. However, the baby was thrown out with the bathwater as soon as the effort to no longer be viewed (on the surface anyhow) as the scourge of mankind, crossed the line into not wanting to be viewed as “oppressors” of their women. Ultimately, this ended up with most of them in the situation of being socially and politically restricted from reasonable ethnic/cultural autonomy, and will if left unchecked, lead to restriction of national autonomy.
So it pleased me very much that in the wake of Anders Brevik’s shooting and bombing spree, the academic community in Norway might actually be doing something real to prevent a similar tragedy. Even better, the person they chose to represent the men’s rights and cultural recovery side in a recent panel wasn’t a crazy skinhead. It was Elvind Berge.
Nontheless, during the debate, he was compared to Hitler and told that he needs to see a psychologist. Police were lined up outside the building, and crowds of people showed up to gawk at the supposed terrorist sympathizer. The other panelists were applauded for making unfair and outright false statements about Mr. Berge, and yet somehow he gets cast as the Nazi.
Now, he is being ostracized for his views in a way that no Arab supporter of terrorists who actually sends money to terrorist cover organizations and participates in very public anti Israel protests has ever been, to my knowledge, in any western country, even Israel. He has been kicked out of his apartment by the landlord and refused by others. Yet somehow he is cast as the Nazi.
These blatant sexists and racists who believe that women and people of color are incapable of getting employment and education on an equal basis in a society and nation with both laws and social conditions enforcing their equality, and need quotas…
These puritanical sexual mafiosas who strip people of their legal right to sex between consenting adults on whatever terms they choose so long as they do not cause unreasonable harm…
These goose stepping mobs of torch wielding de facto illiterates who ignore 90% of human history…
These people who export their social disease to Mother Africa with the same presumed moral supremacist fervor with which they used to colonize and exploit her, only as a cover for a more (effective but still exploitive) Roman style of colonization…
These White devils have decided that Elvind Berge is the devil despite the fact that he is neither sexist nor racist enough to view women or people of color as the default victims of anything European or male by default of it being European or male. It is because he does not view himself as a devil who must repent by committing genetic suicide, the real devils want to point the finger at him and not themselves.
Anders Brevik is indeed a monster, but he is a monster that feminism and the multicult made. If the society he grew up in had invested in him, then he may have felt more invested in that society, and rather than going on a killing spree against it, he’d have directed that energy towards enemies on a battle field.
Many African American men in the U.S. deprived of constructive ways to express their manhood and channel their aggressive energies turn to drugs, gangs, and misdirected violence. Why should this be different for Europeans? Africans in Africa who find their ethnicities/cultures under attack react with violence. Why should this be different for Europeans?
Is a man a devil for simply expressing what is a very natural way to feel about having one’s manhood stomped down by their government?
I have to wonder about all the supposed men who do not see anything wrong with gender and ethnic quotas, prostitution being illegal (meaning that consensual sex is regulated), and their country putting more money into absorbing hostile immigrants than into supporting citizens. Is it that if you are not a sucker, you are a devil?
Fine then. Let’s bring back the White devil.
Time has shown that the Black man keeping certain features of his more monstrous stereotypes has been good for him. As sweet and kind as a Brother may be, we all know and like the fact that if you push him too far, he is going to push back.
Eastern European men also have that something about them. So it is not that White men have all lost that. It’s just that regionally, western Europeans have allowed themselves to be politically overrun by ideologues posing as idealists. They may not be able to turn things around politically overnight, but they can decide that the label of White devil isn’t a bad thing.
One guy coming out gets used as an example, but millions? They can’t evict you all from all of your apartments. All of your wives aren’t going to divorce all of you. In fact, they will love you more for being a man than they loved you for pretending to be Mr. Sensitive.
Wear your horns with pride. Everyone else views you as the Great Satan no matter what you do anyway. Might as well do what you want.