Well, if it’s fear then this is a new fear injected by feminism. Apparently, European men felt it was a good thing to spread their seed around right up into modern eugenics. They made many rationalizations in favor of it until the suffragettes, in their jealousy, decided to rein it in. I mean, think about it…400 years of your men being able to pretty much do whatever they want, if not with you, with a lower class European woman, a slave, or an adventurous wanderer…

This just had to stop. You know prohibition was more about keeping men out of the juke joints than it was about alcohol. When that didn’t quite work out except on a surface level, the next wave of feminists made it about victimization. On a certain level, they were right, but they went anti Nature when they ignored the fact that every group is prone to anomic behaviors.

Takie Sugiyama Lebra in Japanese Patterns of Behaviour puts it thusly:

If they accepted and told the whole truth, it would first of all, justify the societal limitation of female sexual expression, to protect us from danger. Second, they would have to admit to the history of anomic behavior of European women towards African men, including almost routine false rape accusations when the African man refuses or does not behave as the European woman fantasized he would, or just to absolve herself of any responsibility for the encounter.

The European feminist woman is the innocent in all things, and casts herself as either the victim or the heroine, never the offender. So it is the American WN’s duty to secure her future, except when it would mean going against the feminist narrative. European women needed to limit European male sexuality so they would have a captive audience regardless of how horrid they generally became.

So basically, it’s to try to keep European men from shagging the nanny.